Sunday, June 26, 2011

Bye bye vibration

I finally realized that you can turn off the vibration option on your cell phone. I have tolerated it for a long time now, but with the new model I'm currently using, a Sony Ericsson F100i, I have found that the vibration is strong enough to wake the dead.
Why have a mute option if the vibration is going to be as loud as the ringer itself? There have been times when I have muted the phone so as not to be disturbed, and even placed it between two thick pillows to avoid hearing it vibrate. With this phone, even that doesn't work. You can be in a deep sleep, and still wake up from that bloody phone. The only way to avoid being bothered by it is either turning it off or throwing it off a cliff. The second option has become more and more appealing lately.
What's even worse is when I'm teaching a class, or worse, in the middle of an interpretation, and the thing starts ringing. Everyone can hear the vibration, and all over the room you see people looking around, peering anxiously at their bags going "Is it mine??" "No I think it's mine". And then I have to confess, "No, I think it's mine". Or if it's someone elses I do what everybody else does and check my phone too, just in case it's mine, even though it's totally inconsequential since I'm not going to answer while I'm working anyway, but I habitually check it anyway, as most of us do. They invented the mute button so we could avoid this, but I'll be damned if it doesn't happen anyway.
Is the vibration function supposed to serve as a sex toy as well? Because given its strength, I can certainly see how that would be possible. Is this what they had in mind when they designed the Sony Ericsson F100i especially for women? It's small and dainty and the buttons are tiny, but what it lacks in size it definitely makes up for with its vibration function.
Anyway, now I can blissfully say that this no longer is a problem for me. Praise the option to turn off the vibration! No more "BZZZZ...BZZZZZ...BZZZZ!!!! A sound I have slowly grown to despise, as much as fingers on a chalkboard or gum being chewed.
Yay!!!

Saturday, June 18, 2011

I hate animal movies

Not because I don't like animals, but because I love them and it seems to be a must in any Hollywood moving featuring an animal that the animal must in some way get hurt or die. I just can't bare to watch this. Why would I want to see that? I don't care if it's a supposedly happy ending where the animal is at peace because it sacrificed its own life to save a human being. To me this is a terrible ending. The animal dies while the human lives! I mean, no offense to humans, but I'll take animal over a person any day.
Yesterday I caught the ending of this horse movie called "Amanda", and was appalled when they used the horse to drag a flipped-over jeep upright so that the people inside it could get out. It was apparently some kind of emergency. The horse died a painful death in the process, blood seeping out from the wounds it got from pulling on the reigns. My god!!! Why do I need to see that?? And it didn't help that seconds after the horse had gotten the truck to an upright position, we hear rescue sirens approaching. If they had waited 2 more minutes the people in the car would have been saved and the horse wouldn't have had to die to save them! This made me so mad. It was supposed to be one of those sappy Hollywood moments where we cry tears of happiness over the fact that the horse gave its life for its owners. Well all I could do was curse their stupidity and lament the fact that this beautiful animal had to die such a sad death. I couldn't stand the little boy, played by Kieran Culkin, who was the main character, and who came up with this brilliant idea in the first place. It was like nails on a chalkboard watching that whole agonizing scene and I wish I had changed the channel instantly instead of putting myself through that horse crap (pun intended).
It doesn't matter how happy the ending is, I refuse to watch a movie where an animal dies. I cried my eyes out watching "Eight Below". Yes, the dogs were eventually rescued, but what about the ones that died? I just can't cope with it. I should be able to, since they're only movies, but when it comes to animals it's like my common sense and rationality fly out the window.
Then I remind myself that horrible things actually do happen to animals on a daily basis. Like that awful case of a beautiful German Shepherd who had to spend 10 years tied up in a backyard in her own filth with no toys, no comforts and being abused by her owners. If I got my hands on her owners, I don't think I would ever stop hitting. I'd subject them to the very same treatment that they inflicted on their poor dog. I.e I would pee on them, tie them up and let them soil themselves and allow them to live in their own feces etc. See how they like it.

I'm slightly hormonal today, and rather cranky, and am realizing that this post turned into somewhat of an angry rant. Oh well. When it comes to animal abuse, I'm slightly psychotic. I'd like to form a vigilante and go after all those morons who get their jollies out of torturing animals. A mere fine just isn't enough of a punishment.

I better end this post now and take a few deep breaths, and try to get that lame horse movie out of my head.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Elvis is my king


Never in my life have I been so affected by a singer as when I discovered Elvis, at the age of 18. It was like being hit by a bolt of lightning, as corny and cliché as that might sound. There's just no other way to describe it.
I was working in a photo frame store in a mall at the time. I was bored with the job, as I always am with repetitive things, and it was hard to get the days to pass without letting out a scream of frustration. It was a slow day, and as always I let my mind wander. Suddenly Elvis crossed my mind, and I swear it was like this jolt inside my stomach, the kind of feeling you get when you see someone and realize you're in love with that person. All of a sudden I was hooked, and on my lunch break that day I ran up to the library and started digging out any information I could find on him.
An obsession was born. As always, whenever I really like something I go overboard. My whole world became Elvis for years. I bought his music, his movies, his biographies, framed huge posters of him and hung them on the walls of my girlhood room. I dyed my hair jet black to look like him and even tried to dress like him. Bright pink and purple shirts and black suits. On the anniversary of his death I lit candles and placed a red rose in the memorial garden in the local cemetery.
The obsession eventually wore off when I went out there and got myself a life of my own, but the love for Elvis and his music is still there. There has never been anyone like him in my opinion. I find it amazing that he can have such an impact on someone like me, who was barely out of diapers when Elvis died and who was never exposed to him or his music growing up. Yet for some reason he grabbed me, the same way that he continues to spellbind people, young and old. Isn't that pretty amazing, considering he died in 1977 and his music style is so far from what's popular today. It may not be cool to like Elvis, but the fact is millions of people still do. And I don't really care if it's cool or not. I still love his music from the 50's, when he just had his breakthrough. I don't count his movie music from the 60's when I say I like Elvis's music, however when he made his come-back in 68 his voice had deepened and although I by far liked his 50's stuff so much better than what he did in the late 60's and 70's, I really like his voice here. You can hear the depth of it in the remix of A Little Less Conversation, which by the way rocks.
The only other person who comes close to having that special quality that his voice contained is K.d Lang. As far as charisma goes, I don't think there is one singer out there who even comes to close to Elvis.
He's magical. He's my hero. And yes, I am aware that he died fat and strung out on prescription drugs in his bathroom. So what? That doesn't change who he was in the 50's.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Mayhem at Ikea

I haven't written anything in a while. That has its reasons, which will probably be the topic of a later post, if anyone cares.

Going to Ikea on a Saturday is never a good idea but it is an especially bad idea to go right after payday. This means that it will be even more crowded than it usually is.
As always, the place is laced with a slight feeling of general mass-hysteria.
It started in the restaurant, where we came to have lunch after our 2 and a half hour car ride just to get this mekka. Rows and rows of people lined up like cows on their way to the slaughter. It was as if we were all animals being fed. Pigs at a trough. Although the lines were long everything was surprisingly efficient and a mere 15-20 minutes later we had our food. Salmon and steak. My dad and I had salmon, my friend Nina had steak. It was actually not bad.

Then the actual walk through that maze of furniture began. Since I was with my father, who could possibly win a gold medal in department store sprint, if there was such a sport, there wasn't much time to look at anything. Besides, it was too crowded and too noisy for me to be able to find the peace of mind to really take anything in. If I'm in a store and it's crowded and people are all around me grabbing on to things and everybody is tripping over each other, I can't manage to buy anything. I get stressed out by the frenzy you see in some people's eyes. Shopping is bloody serious business, so you better not get in their way.
So we run a marathon through the store, and both have to use the washroom, one after the other, since we both have this inclination to do number 2 every time we're in a store. My mom says it's psychological. Apparently I inherited this particular trait from my dad, because we both have to do it every time we set foot in a department store. It's odd. Anyway, it always boggles the mind how serious people seem to take Ikea. It's like they're on a mission. It's serious business.
I suppose I must do it myself, without knowing it. Let's face it, all those things, all those lamps, carpets, pictures, bed linens, it's mesmerizing. Although I'm never willing to put myself through long lineups and insanely crowded stores, even for a bargain sale. When it comes right down to it, it's just things and I don't need it that badly. However, I love coming out of a store with a bag full of goodies. I love piling things into the shopping cart. I feel like such a moron if I walk around with an empty basket. Like a pauper who can't or isn't allowed to join the party. An outcast. Like there's a group that I'm not a part of and I shouldn't even be there.
This time my shopping bag was meager, since I only emerged from the store with a measly 4 drinking glasses and two sets of bed linens. Oh but I musn't forget the big bag of toffees. That was the first thing I added to my shopping bag.

So we drove the 2 and a half hours home. Kelly got a hot dog since we forgot to bring her dinner. And those were the adventures of the day.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Contemporary horror movies...bleh

I just don't like today's movies nearly as much as I do those from earlier decades. I will gladly watch an 80's movie, provided that it's not an action movie, but when it comes to newly released movies I'm very picky. This is especially the case when it comes to thrillers or horror movies.
Atrocious is the only word that comes to mind.
It boggles the mind that movie makers of today seem to have learnt nothing from their predecessors. The only director who comes close is Wes Craven, and even he goes overboard with the gore sometimes. The body count doesn't need to be 200 for the movie to be good.
Sadly, I decided to watch Rob Zombie's version of Halloween, and I wish now that I had chosen a more fun activity, such as going to the dentist or jabbing a fork through my forehead. Anything would have been better than the utter garbage that Hallowen a'la Rob Zombie offered up. I have fervently tried to forget ever having watched that, err.."movie"... but unfortunately it still lingers in my mind, and not in a good way.
It seems that the only aim of horror movies today is to gross the audience out as much as possible, unlike the older generation of horror movies, such as Halloween, whose aim was to freak us out in a psychological way.
To me, seeing some guy saw off his own foot is gross but it doesn't scare me. All that accomplishes is making me feel slightly nauseous. What I want is the kind of drawn-out suspense that we see in Halloween, Friday the 13th and Jaws, where we don't at first see the killer, we see everything from his/her point of view. By not being so damned literal and graphic, the movies were that much more scary. Less really is more. Understated really is a thousand times more effective than over the top, something that Steven Spielberg, John Carpenter and Bob Clark (director of 1974's Black Christmas)understood. Today's movies are loaded with graphic violence and gory details, almost as if the directors feel the need to shove as much as possible down the audience's gullet just to satisfy their need for gore and special effects. The reason for this is that people have become so desensitized that without a certain level of violence they won't find the movie interesting. This is a rather disturbing trend if you think about it.
Although no one can accuse the older horror movies of being intelligent, it's almost as if audiences have become dumber. They can't think for themselves anymore. They need everything served on a platter, and in large quantities.
With the older generation of movies, such as Jaws and Friday the 13th, the audience had to rely more on their own imagination to get scared. It's like children having too much entertainment at their fingertips, so they're never forced to invent their own games, and thus never really develop the creative skills that kids 50 years ago had to in order to amuse themselves. In a similar way, when we watch horror movies where we can't see the menacing creature/killer, we are forced to imagine what or who it might be and what it looks like. The unknown threat is always much scarier than what we can see.
I'm referring mostly to horror movies here but in fact I find contemporary movies in general to be lacking something. Some of them are really good and I highly enjoy watching them, but there hasn't been one single movie in the past 10 years that I have felt like "Ooh, I need to buy the DVD and keep it for my collection so I can watch as much as I want!".
The last time I felt that movie magic was with Forrest Gump. I can't remember one movie after that where I got that same feeling. I mean there are movies I really appreciate, such as Bridget Jones' Diary, About a Boy, but none that I ever feel like I must own. Maybe I'll feel differently when a sufficient enough time has passed and I can look at them through nostalgic lenses. Could that be the why I prefer older movies to newer ones?
No, certainly not in the case of horror movies. I still contend and will always contend that the art of making good horror movies is a thing of the past.
There has not been one single remake of the old horror classics that I can honestly say that I liked, with the possible exception of When a Stranger Calls. I think they did a pretty good job with that one. The Hills Have Eyes however was atrocious. I don't often turn off a movie and I've never walked out on a movie in the theatre, but with this one I turned it off 20 minutes into it. It was just so obviously violent and in bad taste and in the kind of way where they just shove in your face in an attempt to gross you out as much as possible. Yes, Friday the 13th was also violent, but it was harmless and not so...in your face. With The Hills Have Eyes, I took no joy in watching a girl get raped by some misfits while her parents got murdered and mulilated, one of which got burned at the stake. Lovely!
Hence, I turned the damned thing off.
The original one didn't have to employ such cheap tactics to get under its audience's skin, why did the remake?
And my poor Black Christmas, the classic stalker horror movie, did not deserve to have such a horrible "remake" with the same name. The two movies don't even fall within the same class, not even close.
Same goes for the remake of Friday the 13th.
Please! Directors, watch the old horror movies, pay attention, learn!

Friday, April 29, 2011

Fashion trends I will never embrace

Fashion trends come and go, and sometimes they make a come-back. I can't go back in time and embrace old fads, I just can't. I refuse to wear clogs again, I put that behind me ages ago, I will not wear those huge ugly-ass glasses ever again and a shoulder pad will never again be a part of my wardrobe. Call me unfashionable if you want. I wish I cared.

Here's my take on some of the fashion trends:



Pointy-toed shoes. Actually this item is quite clever and versatile, since it can be used both as a shoe and as a sharp weapon. You can look trendy and be able to protect yourself by stabbing a potential attacker with your shoe at the same time.




Large framed glasses that cover half your face. I wore them during my awkward teens, and I don't care to see them again. They only remind me of Michael Myers in Halloween when he dressed up in a sheet and put on glasses belonging to the guy he just killed. I only wished he would have murdered the glasses too, and buried them deep in fashion history where nobody could ever track them down. Alas, somebody did.




I used to wear shoulder pads. I looked like a linebacker for the Chicago Bears.







A clog? Or a Russet potato?






I would have killed for these when I was 10, and they're hot pink too, my favourite colour at the time. Now I think that leg warmers are bad enough, but the colour hot pink is even worse.





Acid washed jeans, high waisted no less. Throw in a short, brown suede jacket, large framed glasses and frizzy hair and what you get is me at 16.





This is perhaps the ugliest fashion trend to ever have been inflicted on human kind. It looks like you've just dropped a huge load in your pants.





Gladiator shoes. These skeleton-like shoes look like oddly shaped bandages wrist supports but for your ankle instead of shoes. Looks like something you'd wear if you were in physio. They're grotesque.



I just can't make myself embrace the fashion trends from my childhood. Whether it's because I associate them with being a child in the 80's or if it's because they're really tacky I don't know, but I suspect it's a mix. I would gladly wear a Jackie Kennedy skirt suit from the 60's or bell bottoms from the 70's, but I won't wear 80's fashion unless it's an 80's theme party. Fortunately, I don't have to wear something I don't want to wear. It is true that I probably look unfashionable, but that's the penalty I will take. To each his/her own. We live in a world of diversity. Although, isn't fashion rather anti-diversity since it encourages us all to dress alike?

Monday, April 25, 2011

I made a decision

It's not a momentous one. It's simply that I have decided not to suggest any activities to any of my friends anymore. Apart from this one person, whose enthusiasm has to be admired, I can't even remember the last time a friend took me up on a proposal to do something. Either all my suggestion are really lame or most of my friends only like to do things when it's initiated by them. They may call me with invitations to do things but when the tables are turned and it's me doing the asking they're either busy or want to do something else. Hence, I have decided that I am not going to ask anyone to do anything again, with the exception of this one enthusiastic friend. Nor am I going to always make myself available to other people's suggestions.
I don't see why I should always get turned down yet always be available whenever someone wants to do something.
On the other hand, I really don't want to become the kind of control freak that mother is. She has such a remarkable need to be in control that she won't do anything unless it was here idea. There's no doubt in my mind that people who are like this are control freaks. Some people can't do anything unless it was thought of by them. These are truly frustrating people, and I do hope I don't develop this trait. So far I'm ok. Although I do have some control issues, I still enjoy doing things suggested by others.
This Easter has been rather lethargic for me. I have felt listless and a bit glum. While other people love spring and get all energized and happy, I experience the opposite end of the spectrum. I get physically tired, listless, and down. I believe the term is seasonal depression. Whether it's due to physical causes or mental ones I have no idea, but there you have it. I'm an autumn person all the way. Autumn doesn't stress me out the way spring does. In the spring I feel so stressed everytime I'm not making the most out of a sunny day. There is the constant pressure to be outside and to be doing something. What if you have nowhere to go? What if sitting in the sunshine bores you out of your skull? What if walking around aimlessly isn't your cup of tea and it depresses you rather than makes you happy?
I think the Swedish poet Kristina Lugn had a similar sentiment, what if you don't live up to the expectations of what spring and summer should be like? It feels as though everybody in the world is doing something but you. Stressful.
I admit that although this trait of mine appears to be inherent, since I have always felt this way, it's partly due to my own expectations and demands. Rather than fill me with peace, sitting on a blanket on a meadow makes me restless, unless there is an animal present. Even a rabbit will do. Barbequing with friends is nice but cliché and it doesn't make the earth move. Going downtown to eat an ice cream and watch people stroll by annoys me almost as much as it does when other people stare at me. I still think people watching is rude and I refuse to do it. People like to call it "people watching" to make it sound more sophisticated but really it's just plain old staring. I don't know exactly what it is I should be doing in order for me to feel as though I'm making the most of my summer, but I suspect that anything less than being right smack by the ocean falls short, or at least a body of water. We used to take daytrips to this wonderful place called Buntzen Lake, where we would sit and eat, drink and, if it was warm enough, go swimming. That was marvellous. I must have been a mermaid or something in an earlier life because the water is the only thing that gives me peace and true enjoyment and makes feel like I'm alive. I remember the feeling I got when we were in Crete two summers ago, and I first got to sit down right in front of the water and the waves were crashing in. Amazing and lovely are the only words to describe it.